Why Under Investing In Your Preference Management System Is Costing You Customers
Selecting preferences is commonplace in our digital world. Users subscribe or unsubscribe from email lists, request notifications from their favorite brands, and update their privacy settings on social media networks. It’s a win-win for both parties; consumers are supposed to be given a voice for their likes and dislikes in the marketing they receive, and how frequently companies interact with them through preferred communication channels.
Marketing teams are granted first-hand insight to unique customer characteristics and product interests—the ultimate opportunity to give customers exactly what they want and enhance relationships. Many organizations recognize the need to collect preferences, and even more so, customers now expect it; especially in lieu of strict regulations including GDPR, e-Privacy, TCPA, and CASL. While preference collection is important, how a business manages that information is critical to maintaining compliance. Unfortunately, many brands still miss the mark.
Executives must understand their needs before debating whether to build or buy a preference management solution. Not all preference management platforms are created equal; yet many companies try to take the easy way out, choosing to leverage an existing system that is not designed for the need at hand. A survey by DeviceBits found 55 percent of marketers collect data but aren’t analyzing patterns of behavior during customer service, and 16 percent even said they do not collect any data at all. This means that 70 percent of marketers and brands are driving their customer experience with blinders on. They are unaware of the risks they assume and opportunities forgone by relying on with a simple preference collection webpage.
The majority of SMS and email service providers have built-in preference collection interfaces, where data is stored within the system and provides access to administrators. While this approach provides basic functionality and may meet the needs of small companies with a sole communication channel, larger companies face complex challenges, requiring more intricate technology. All too often, large companies with multiple departments and communication touchpoints are implementing a simple web page to collect preferences as their “solution.” This is wherein the danger lies.
Executives must understand their needs before debating whether to build or buy a preference management solution
Surprising to many organizations, preference and consent collection is not a simple issue to tackle. DIY solutions lack proper governance that drives preference management capabilities and fail to distribute information across the entire enterprise leaving each business unit with varied perspectives of a client, prospect, or customer. Without a unified view of the customer, each business unit risks sending impersonal communications to those who have made the effort to share their interests and preferences. Further, compliance is jeopardized by the systems’ inability to record consent history and track changes to preferences. In the wake of a violation accusation, customer consent, and preference history is essential to defend your company. As the amount of data escalates and regulations continue to evolve, employing am over simplified preference webpage heightens the potential for legal battles and presents more alarming issues than it attempts to solve.
Customers view companies as a single entity but basic preference collection webpages prevent companies from behaving like one. They behave as siloed systems, information systems that isolate data from the rest of the organization. By resorting to a simple preference webpage companies are missing out on the marketing opportunity. When customer preference information is shared across the organization, marketing efforts can be customized to effectively deliver a personalized and consistent message. Instead, customers experience inconsistent interactions, unwanted emails, and phone calls; they are turned away feeling unheard.
Once businesses are aware of the dangers associated with over simplified or DIY systems, they realize the value of robust enterprise preference management solutions. A centrally located management system is necessary to minimize risk; integration across the whole company guarantees all business units are in-sync, listening to the customer, and communicating with them accordingly. These systems build trust, enhancing vital and customer relations and ROI. A study by InfoQuest found that a satisfied customer will contribute up to 2.6 times more revenue compared to an unsatisfied customer. In the case that compliance is called into question, experienced systems protect legal authority through following regulatory rules, recording data, and providing businesses with a full history of each consent permission to date.
Many businesses build their own internal solution for consent and preference collection in attempt to save money or retain control; ironically, they are losing money and missing the mark. When deciding to Build or Buy, businesses must be aware of the differences at hand. Preference webpages collect fragmented data and fail to integrate information provided by the customer to the remaining business units. As a result, businesses open themselves up to compliance violations and negative customer relationships. On the other hand, investing in a preference management system integrates information company wide and continuously evolves with data privacy regulations to protect your company and remain compliant. These systems allow you to take full advantage of the marketing opportunity to optimize your communications, customer relationships, and define optimal targets.
How the Internet of Things can Unearth Innovation in Oil & Gas Industry
Cloud : A Key Player in Welfare of Citizens through IT
Architect Your Business to Engage, Interact and Serve 'Things' as a New Customer Segment
It's all about the users: The single most important factor to CRM success is the implementation approach
By James Seevers, CIO & GM, Toyoda Gosei
By Bill Krivoshik, SVP & CIO, Time Warner Inc.
By Gregory Morrison, SVP & CIO, Cox Enterprises
By Alberto Ruocco, CIO, American Electric Power
By Bruce. D. Smith, SVP & CIO, Information Systems, Advocate...
By Adrian Mebane, VP-Global Ethics & Compliance, The Hershey...
By Graham Welch, Director-Cisco Security, Cisco
By Michael Watkins, Senior Product Director, Global Knowledge
By Bernd Schlotter, President of Services, Unify
By Patrick Hale, CIO, VITAS Healthcare
By Steve Bein, VP-GIS, Michael Baker International
By Jason Alan Snyder, CTO, Momentum Worldwide
By Mike Morris, CIO, Legends
By Louis Carr, Jr., CIO, Clark County
By Bill Dow, SVP and General Manager of Business Solutions,...
By Jim Whitehurst, CEO, Red Hat
By Darren Cockrel, CIO, Coyote Logistics, a UPS Company...
By Nathan Johnson, SVP and CIO, Werner Enterprises [NASDAQ:...
By David Tamayo, CIO, DCS Corporation
By Neil Hampshire, CIO, ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc....